|
Post by Craig Christ on Jan 18, 2008 9:38:56 GMT -5
Well, if you have a brainwave that you simply must share with us and possible ideas for VCW, post it here.
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 18, 2008 9:44:39 GMT -5
Concept match: Territory Match (name subject to change)
It's a spin on the Falls Count Anywhere match, where combatants are only allowed to pin or submit their opponents within designated areas of the arena (which would be color-coded to represent each combatant). This would also include color-coded spots in the ring (which would be split in half for singles matches, or upto 4 quadrants for 4way Dances).
|
|
|
Post by Craig Christ on Jan 18, 2008 9:47:41 GMT -5
That sounds good. We could also do a spinoff eventually with a best out of 3 territory match. You have to pin your opponent in your designated territory AND in his designated territory? That sound alright?
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 18, 2008 9:49:04 GMT -5
Nice idea. That would definitely work. We could have all sorts of alterations with this concept.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Forrest on Jan 18, 2008 10:49:47 GMT -5
Barbed Wire Royal Rumble: Entire outside is covered in a layer of razor wire so when you get tossed over the rope you land in it
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 19, 2008 23:07:25 GMT -5
I thought of a lumberjack spin to the territory match. Each territory is protected by up to two wrestlers of the territory owner's choosing, and he may choose whether to make use of this feature or not. The "soldiers" cannot leave their designated territory voluntarily or else they get thrown out of the match.
Of course, this can't coincide with the best of 3 territory match as it's hard to pin an opponent in their territory without getting beat up yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Forrest on Jan 19, 2008 23:08:27 GMT -5
i like that though solid idea
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 20, 2008 0:10:43 GMT -5
Another coolio modification idea, Romeo.
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 20, 2008 0:18:29 GMT -5
I have this nagging feeling that we'll use this territory match to crown our first champion.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Forrest on Jan 20, 2008 0:20:18 GMT -5
that might not be such a bad idea
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 20, 2008 0:22:50 GMT -5
I agree. The sky seems like the limit w/ what can be done w/ that match type.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Forrest on Jan 20, 2008 0:25:59 GMT -5
So Romeo, what kind of fed isa this gonna be or have you guys not decided yet
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 20, 2008 0:31:45 GMT -5
Threep told me that we were gonna focus on uniqueness instead of copying, whatever the hell that meant. I'll let him elaborate on his answer.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Forrest on Jan 20, 2008 0:32:55 GMT -5
lol sounds good
|
|
Austin
Lower Midcarder
Posts: 172
|
Post by Austin on Jan 20, 2008 2:42:07 GMT -5
I am feeling this territory match.
|
|
|
Post by Craig Christ on Jan 20, 2008 7:52:07 GMT -5
This will be similiar in structure to FMW and LPW. However,im hoping we can get a very unique feel to this. Innovative new matches, new storylines, new superstars for the lime-light.As much as possible,we'll try to run these shows in FMW's off-time to avoid scheduling conflicts. And, i will not be using Ken Ryans or Threepwood here. :-)
|
|
ribz
Developmental Talent
Posts: 41
|
Post by ribz on Jan 20, 2008 8:03:36 GMT -5
I can write matches for you guys. Can we try to get shows out less than a month after voting ends. Waiting that long is such a bitch.
I'm Andy Savana from LPW.
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 20, 2008 8:11:22 GMT -5
I can write matches for you guys. Can we try to get shows out less than a month after voting ends. Waiting that long is such a bitch. Lol. The only reason why shows are late are because assignments are usually submitted late.
|
|
|
Post by Craig Christ on Jan 20, 2008 8:18:37 GMT -5
I think we'll have a sufficiently smaller roster at first, which should alleviate time constraints.
|
|
ribz
Developmental Talent
Posts: 41
|
Post by ribz on Jan 20, 2008 8:22:43 GMT -5
Ah alright. Good. I can write a 6000 word match in a couple of hours so don't worry about me.
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 20, 2008 8:23:39 GMT -5
I think we'll have a sufficiently smaller roster at first, which should alleviate time constraints. I mentioned this somewhere. Lol.
|
|
13
Developmental Talent
Posts: 38
|
Post by 13 on Jan 20, 2008 10:05:17 GMT -5
I have a little expierience with match writing and I'm usually on time with deadlines and such so if you guys need any help in that area PM me.
|
|
|
Post by Mortus on Jan 20, 2008 14:25:00 GMT -5
I am feeling this territory match. I'd love to be in a territory match. That'd be sweet.
|
|
Austin
Lower Midcarder
Posts: 172
|
Post by Austin on Jan 20, 2008 15:11:53 GMT -5
What about belt(s) designs, I'd like to see the classic IC belt or even the Attitude era belt make for a title.
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 20, 2008 21:03:47 GMT -5
Glad that the Territory match is getting so much love! It could be like a VCW staple.
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 20, 2008 22:13:12 GMT -5
Here's another match concept: the Stack-em Up match.
A spin on the Ladder match, where instead of using a ladder to climb up an retrieve whatever item it is that is being fought for, the competitors would have to stack up a numerous amount of a specific object, such as different sized crates, special inter-lockable steel blocks (resembling steel steps), or someshit along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by Ro on Jan 20, 2008 23:24:41 GMT -5
Lol @ steel steps. Then it could be called a Stairway to Heaven match.
But being a hardcore environment, wouldn't there be ladders just hiding somewhere in the ring anyway? Or are ladders banned?
|
|
Austin
Lower Midcarder
Posts: 172
|
Post by Austin on Jan 20, 2008 23:29:41 GMT -5
I guess Ladders would be banned in this one.
Idea: We could have a 6-pack Cell or Elimination Chamber type match. But, some things would be different. any help for this?
|
|
|
Post by Super 'Mella Bear on Jan 20, 2008 23:46:22 GMT -5
Lol @ steel steps. Then it could be called a Stairway to Heaven match. But being a hardcore environment, wouldn't there be ladders just hiding somewhere in the ring anyway? Or are ladders banned? Nice match name, Rome. And yes, ladders would be banned.
|
|
|
Post by Craig Christ on Jan 21, 2008 1:21:54 GMT -5
I'm going to speak with Cyn this morning. He's pretty good at creating match types. Not all of them will be known to the competitors, to keep in that surprise factor. But oh yes, we have big plans.
|
|